Club Adventist
Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do.
And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with
– even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department.
Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently. Romans 14.1: The Message
Custom Search
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#131179 - 06/23/07 11:25 PM Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+
james423 Moderator Offline


Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 547
Loc: Dayton, Tennessee
Here is a question I would most probably use to get my Sabbath School discussion started:

With all the sin and nastiness in the current marriage relationship in general, how do you think God wants women to relate to men?
A Christian woman's place in a marriage is that of a:
Only one choice allowed


Votes accepted starting: 06/23/07 11:21 PM
View the results of this poll.
A Christian husband's place in a marriage is that of a:
Only one choice allowed


Votes accepted starting: 06/23/07 11:23 PM
View the results of this poll.
God's role in a Christian marriage is that of a:
Only one choice allowed


Votes accepted starting: 06/23/07 11:25 PM
View the results of this poll.
_________________________
James Brenneman

Top
#131282 - 06/24/07 03:04 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: james423]
cricket Offline


Registered: 11/11/03
Posts: 4886
The first two questions will surely stir the hearts of many in your class, in my opinion. "Near equal" and "benevolent ruler" are close--but not what God intended.
_________________________
http://tinyurl.com/55ngvd

Top
#131464 - 06/25/07 12:02 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: james423]
annie Offline


Registered: 10/24/06
Posts: 82

hi James 423!
I am wondering, did Eve desire to have a position higher then
Adam as Satan also desired the place of honor that was God's? Not sure if this can be answered but was wondering.

Thanks,
annie

Top
#131468 - 06/25/07 03:52 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: annie]
olger Offline


Registered: 12/27/05
Posts: 3130
Loc: Ohio
 Originally Posted By: annie

hi James 423!
I am wondering, did Eve desire to have a position higher then
Adam as Satan also desired the place of honor that was God's? Not sure if this can be answered but was wondering.

Thanks,
annie
Good question Annie. Steven Vincent Wallace addresses this question is his excellent series "Glory & Authority." Lucifer was in a sense a help-meet for God, who turned against Him.

Top
#132168 - 06/30/07 03:52 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: olger]
ChildofChrist Offline


Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 5048
Loc: 37321
I answered the 1st and 3rd questions in your poll. Had I considered number 2, I would not have chosen the opinions given.
_________________________
For God is love, and love is life.
~~Child of Christ~~

Top
#132275 - 06/30/07 08:25 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: ChildofChrist]
james423 Moderator Offline


Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 547
Loc: Dayton, Tennessee
At least it got you thinking.
_________________________
James Brenneman

Top
#132425 - 07/01/07 05:12 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: annie]
Norman Online   content
The Troubadour

Registered: 03/19/05
Posts: 1925
Loc: Georgia/US
hi Annie, very good question!
 Quote:
I am wondering, did Eve desire to have a position higher then Adam as Satan also desired the place of honor that was God's? Not sure if this can be answered but was wondering.


If that were the case, Eve would not have brought the fruit to Adam. Does that meake sense?

Norman
_________________________
The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and He addeth no sorrow with it. Proverbs 10:22

http://www.icompel.com

Top
#132428 - 07/01/07 05:32 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Norman]
Gerry Cabalo Online   content


Registered: 03/20/00
Posts: 7412
Loc: Wilkesboro, NC
To all,

What is an ideal marriage?

Gerry

Top
#132434 - 07/01/07 05:42 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Gerry Cabalo]
Norman Online   content
The Troubadour

Registered: 03/19/05
Posts: 1925
Loc: Georgia/US
 Quote:
What is an ideal marriage?


Well if we look at our first parent's, the only thing that messed them up was beleiving the lies of Satan and disobeying God. If we can believe the love that God has for us and obey God rather than Satan we would do well.
_________________________
The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and He addeth no sorrow with it. Proverbs 10:22

http://www.icompel.com

Top
#132483 - 07/01/07 10:15 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Norman]
Gerry Cabalo Online   content


Registered: 03/20/00
Posts: 7412
Loc: Wilkesboro, NC
 Originally Posted By: Norman
 Quote:
What is an ideal marriage?


Well if we look at our first parent's, the only thing that messed them up was beleiving the lies of Satan and disobeying God. If we can believe the love that God has for us and obey God rather than Satan we would do well.


I have been doing some reading in preparation to teach this lesson next week. What I have found so far is that divorce among conservative Christians (according to some pollsters) is actually higher than atheists & non-religionists. So I need something more specific & concrete than just believing that God loves me.

Gerry

Top
#132500 - 07/02/07 12:10 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Gerry Cabalo]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 8960
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
One problem is that to many are looking for the "ideal" in sinners. God wants us to work at our marriage ... not just have the easy "ideal". God does not believe in divorce ... so He wants us to work hard at it so that it will mature.
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Love WON Another.
Redwood the tree

Top
#132525 - 07/02/07 02:57 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Redwood]
Gerry Cabalo Online   content


Registered: 03/20/00
Posts: 7412
Loc: Wilkesboro, NC
 Originally Posted By: Redwood
One problem is that to many are looking for the "ideal" in sinners. God wants us to work at our marriage ... not just have the easy "ideal". God does not believe in divorce ... so He wants us to work hard at it so that it will mature.


If you don't have a benchmark, a standard, an ideal, by which to compare what you have, then you wouldn't have the foggiest notion what to work on.

Gerry

Top
#132528 - 07/02/07 03:41 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Gerry Cabalo]
annie Offline


Registered: 10/24/06
Posts: 82
Marriage should mean something to people. The reason for marriage has become simply everything but what it was originally intended which was to be the uniting of two individuals for creating children. In that unity the family is born and both partners work to nurture,love,teach, and defend the family and protect the relationship from outside sources that would harm it. When the two become one, there no longer exists me or him but we. Self is suppose to end and as you grow in love if one stumbles the other picks him/her up and helps them as they continue together understanding that neither is perfect and that God has entrusted you to one another so as is said, What God has joined together let NO MAN put usunder. Birds are a great example of what a working partnership should be. The bridegroom of the church (bride) is another great example as well.

Top
#132544 - 07/02/07 10:07 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: annie]
monica Offline
Getting the hang of posting

Registered: 05/06/07
Posts: 72
Loc: Romania - Spain
 Originally Posted By: annie
The reason for marriage has become simply everything but what it was originally intended which was to be the uniting of two individuals for creating children.


¨And Jehovah God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a help meet for him.¨
So, according to the Bible, the main reason for marriage was not creating children.


Edited by monica (07/02/07 10:07 AM)
_________________________
We love Him because He first loved us.

Top
#132547 - 07/02/07 03:39 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: monica]
rudywoofs Offline
stumbling to the cross

Registered: 07/16/05
Posts: 2077
Loc: in the mists of time


 Originally Posted By: monica
 Originally Posted By: annie
The reason for marriage has become simply everything but what it was originally intended which was to be the uniting of two individuals for creating children.


¨And Jehovah God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a help meet for him.¨
So, according to the Bible, the main reason for marriage was not creating children.


I agree with Monica and her quote. To think that the only reason for marriage is to procreate is....well.....**coughs**..... kind of odd thinking.
_________________________
Pam



There is never panic in heaven.
~ Corrie ten Boom ~


Top
#132555 - 07/02/07 04:51 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: Gerry Cabalo]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 8960
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
 Originally Posted By: Gerry Cabalo
 Originally Posted By: Redwood
One problem is that to many are looking for the "ideal" in sinners. God wants us to work at our marriage ... not just have the easy "ideal". God does not believe in divorce ... so He wants us to work hard at it so that it will mature.


If you don't have a benchmark, a standard, an ideal, by which to compare what you have, then you wouldn't have the foggiest notion what to work on.

Apparently you are not very well connected to God and the Holy Spirit. The H.S. works with each of us individually at a different pace. This is why standards in the church do not work well for any culture.

Gerry
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Love WON Another.
Redwood the tree

Top
#132580 - 07/02/07 07:37 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: rudywoofs]
annie Offline


Registered: 10/24/06
Posts: 82
Why is it odd thinking to suggest marriage is for procreation?
Couldn't God have made Adam and Steve to fulfill the work of "tending the garden than?" Since there was no death,disease,or other destruction the only thing that could have needed tending to was life and the giving of life?! Again the only thing that was found to be "wrong" at that point of man's creation was his being alone. "It is not good that man should be alone" 2:18 Eve is created from a piece of Adam (who God breathed life into)and in turn a "piece" from each creates a whole new "man". Eve means mother of all living. The actual fruit to be multiplied is love for one another as it multiplies in us and through us. Toward man and toward God.

Top
#132976 - 07/05/07 02:27 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: annie]
Jeannieb43 Offline
Princess of Pasadena

Registered: 12/29/01
Posts: 2583
Loc: California
Dick Nies, one of my favorite Sabbath school teachers (now deceased), used to say God did not put Adam and Eve into this world to trim shrubs!

He had a much greater purpose for mankind; and this was to prove to the unfallen worlds that it is possible to love God and to follow Him by doing God's will because we love and trust Him -- withOUT becoming robots or automatons. We were created with free will. We love and serve God because we CHOOSE to do so, not because of any immediate rewards we receive for doing so.

In other words, the Sabbath Day might possibly be rainy cloudy or stormy, but it is still the Sabbath Day of God's Rest. He doesn't make that day more beautiful than the other six; He doesn't give us immediate rewards for worshiping on that particular day; we do so because we love Him, because that's the day of our "love date" with our Creator/Saviour.

On the topic of the equality of Adam and Eve, I believe Eve ran to Adam with the fruit for two reasons: 1) God had told them never to be apart; and 2) Their marriage included 'togetherness' which was such an integral part of the relationship that Eve just naturally, reflexively, gravitated back to Adam. They were actually two parts of a whole. They were created to belong together, and were not individuals who even cared to operate separately.
_________________________
Jeannie


...Change is inevitable; growth is optional....

Top
#132996 - 07/05/07 04:55 AM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: annie]
olger Offline


Registered: 12/27/05
Posts: 3130
Loc: Ohio
Those are some thoughtful points, sister Annie.


`og

Top
#133025 - 07/05/07 02:37 PM Re: Lesson 1 - Adam & Eve: Intended Ideal - DISCUSSION+ [Re: olger]
Gladussee Online   content
Posting "as the Spirit moves"

Registered: 07/08/00
Posts: 678
Loc: Apopka, FL. USA
So..........what really messed up Adam and Eve first was that they didn't stick together.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >


Moderator:  james423 
Our Store


30 days FREE

This full membership income helps pay for hosting, advertising, domain names, software support etc etc
Shout Box

The Chat Room

Come Chat with others,
open 24/7

Who's Online
60 registered (AdventistWoman, aldona, babydeed, Beryl, Bravus, Bruce_G, bygjymbo, CGMedley, CoAspen, darlene, dgrimm60, Doug, Ellen, fccool, forgie, fun2believe, Gerry Cabalo, Gladussee, guibox, Heather Cummings, Jerry D Thomas, John317, Kevin H, Kountzer, lazarus, Lineman, Liz, Loren Fenton, melvin mccarty, mikeyswen79, Morning Glory, Nan, Neil D, Nightingale, Norman, pkrause, Redwood, Robert, SMAN, Suzanne Sutton, Taylor, truthseeker007, Vera, 17 invisible), 465 Guests and 277 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Featured Member
Registered: 10/18/02
Posts: 609
Top Posters (30 Days)
Redwood 839
John317 739
Shane 446
Neil D 350
Bravus 307
Robert 281
carolaa 281
fccool 223
BobRyan 221
rush4hire 178
Taylor 153
Stan Jensen 153
Amelia 128
olger 120
Gail 115
pkrause 95
Nan 92
Lineman 77
Gerry Cabalo 75
Liz 74
Top Posters
Amelia 18424
Shane 16937
Robert 15363
Gail 13578
Neil D 13147
John317 10223
Redwood 8960
Gerry Cabalo 7412
Naomi 7196
Gregory Matthews 7111
Bravus 7051
Nan 6018
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5048
cricket 4886
bevin 4699
LifeHiscost 4145
Stan Jensen 3898
D. Allan 3883
dgrimm60 3591
Newest Members
parsongarlic, babydeed, jamesfishe, Birdy75, iyke
2972 Registered Users

THE ADVENTIST FORUM® is a self-supporting ministry and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland or any of its subsidiaries.
Copyright © ClubAdventist.com® 1999 - 2008