Questions frequently come-- "What does the church say about...?" These enquiries come from the Seventh-day Adventist believers themselves, church pastors and also from the general public or media. Reflecting on the development of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in the 1980s and 90s, we recognize an active interest in many church circles to develop and publicize the church's position statements on specific topics or issues. Often, these are a reaction to a prominent public agenda issue. It goes without saying that the church as a moral force in the society is expected to clarify or express its stance, or even develop a particular concern. Adventists, as members of the society at large, often mirror the challenges and needs of those around them. Some of the issues are not new, but they are more pressing today, perhaps. The documents available here represent a whole spectrum of these issues and concerns.


The denomination's history dates back to the 1860s when the church organization was formally established. From the early years, and through its history, Seventh-day Adventists have been recognized as a group of conscientious Christians who are vocal about and prominent in taking up a stand for a number of causes and issues. The list of these is quite impressive -- civil rights and anti-slavery stance, religious liberty, health and temperance reform, leadership in prevention of alcoholism and drug dependency, anti-tobbacco lobby, education, welfare, aid and development, and so on.


Though the past heritage sees Adventists as reform-minded, it also shows the church leadership as sometimes reluctant to take public position. Exceptions include such issues as religious freedom and temperance. It was typical for Adventists to emphasize that changes in the society are best effected through the changing of personal lives of the individuals. Public pronouncements or action were not the preferred approaches in influencing the social agenda. 

So, though Adventists successfully used the church pulpit and the classroom to speak against social ills or promote Christian values, they have not, until recently, formalized their official position through public statements. It was a non-creedal approach at the outset, with the "fundamental beliefs" being formulated into a "doctrinal statement" only in the 1930s.

This web site presents statements and guidelines discussed, approved and voted by the church leadership since 1980. These were written with a different public in mind, some reflecting a particular internal interest of the church. Here you will find documents issued by the General Conference in session, by the General Conference Executive Committee, by the Administrative Committee of the General Conference, or by the Office of the General Conference president. The documents accessible here fall into three categories:

1. Position statements, including the Mission Statement of the
2. Seventh-day Adventist Church;Guidelines; and
3. Other documents, such as a study paper on AIDS, or a document explaining the church's view on inter-church relations and the so-called ecumenical movement.


As the church continues to grow and make an influence, its role in the society will require that its views and what it holds true becomes known. Such will continue be the demands of the society, and such will be the need to define Adventism's relevance, or present truth, to those who are asking questions and seeking answers to their dilemmas and problems.

The documents presented here are not an end in themselves, but a reflection of a movement sensitive to its calling and the people who "know how to answer everyone" (Col 4:6 NIV).

The importance of these documents can be thus summarized -- actions speak louder than the words.

[Ray Dabrowski, Director, Communication Department, World Church Headquarters]

Just to make this very clear, these are not mine... as said on the intro they are from

http://www.adventist.org/beliefs/statements/index.html

Stan, I do not think we need 28 beliefs for our church. I have figured it out to a Perfect 7!
Pearly

I'm not sure why they keep growing ... but it does make me worry for all those that died before they grew.

And personally ... I think 7 is too many.

Pearly & Redwood, which ones would you eliminate?

Gerry

I would reduce it to one.

We believe in the Bible as our sole guide.

I remember reading a while ago where you said you agree with the 28. What happened?!

Having the Bible as our guide doesn't mean we can't believe in the 28 fundamental doctrines of the church. There's no conflict. Those are simply seen as fundamental, not that they are all that the Bible says. The 28 are doctrines that we are united on and that we give emphasis to. Well, at least we should be united on them.

Since you and I believe in the 28 ... and there is "no conflict" ... then why not just have one ...

"We believe in the Bible as our sole guide."

That would cover all 28 and even more. And you would never need to constantly update your fundamentals ... for this one is everlasting.

For the simple reason that some who claim to go only by the Bible believe that when you die you go immediately to heaven. Others who believe in the Bible worship on Sunday and believe that at any minute Christ may come invisibly and quietly for his church. Those of us who are in the Seventh-day Adventist movement don't believe the Bible teaches as they do, so we have decided to let the world know how our beliefs differ from many other Christians. It's a way of saying, "Hey, over here-- if you believe the Bible teaches thus and so, come meet with us."

So I see the the 28 Fundamental beliefs serving as a sign or a marker. That is really what the three angels messages are too. The 28, and the Third Angels Message, makes a distinction. They really should draw a distinction, or separate from the world (in the Biblical sense).

Not sure there needs to be a seperation between Christian believers. I would say that all should be welcome if they want to worship with us ... no matter how they viewed the State of the Dead.

The important thing is that we believe in the Bible. We as SDAs have a wide difference of thought in regards to Righteousness by Faith for example. The doctrine of being Saved by Grace is as important as it gets ... yet many in our church do not accept this.

I hold the door open to all those Christians ... even those who don't believe as I do in Salvation by Grace. I would not want to create a barrier to those people. I've found that those who believe in Salvation by works are most sincere. And I welcome them in church because ...

The Wheat and Tares will grow together till the harvest. And they are to have the full advantage of the sun. We are to be close to them and witness of the Son to each one.