Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#166977 - 04/17/08 06:41 PM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: David Koot]
Vera Offline


Registered: 05/19/07
Posts: 72
Originally Posted By: David Koot
Originally Posted By: Vera
If you have to read Genesis 1 and 2 literally, you have to read the entire Bible literally.

Correct, unless a passage states that it is a 'parable,' for example, or some other intended application. Do you see a problem with reading the entire Bible in such a light?

The short answer to your question is yes.

The longer answer is not only too long for this format but is still being formed, and I may very well blog it shortly.

In a roundabout way, however, I can tell you the reason for the short answer.

Do Bible writers consistently and explicitly signal the type of writing they're about to do? If not, should Bible readers, using a variety of methods, use their best judgment to make that determination? Are Bible readers who hold to sola scriptura already doing that in spite of their best efforts?

Originally Posted By: Shane
There is nothing in Genesis that indicates it is not to be read literally. In fact, the evidence is quite the contrary. The evidence indicates that the prophets, apostles and Christ read Genesis literally.


Here, permit me to share a quote from Paradigms on Pilgrimage: Creationism, Paleontology and Biblical Interpretation:

Quote:
In preparing for a debate with a young-earth creationist, he [Stephen J. Godfrey, paleontologist and co-author of the book] decided—after several years of avoiding the Genesis creation account because of painful experiences associated with it—to reacquaint himself with it by reading it through many times. In so doing, he made a startling discovery. He realized to that point he had not been able to make sense of what was written because he had automatically but subconsciously been interpreting the text based on a 21st-century cosmological understanding. His reading was suffering from the proverbial "paradigm effect."

Therefore, in rereading the creation account, he made a conscious effort to forget what he knew about the structure of our solar system and the universe beyond.... The result of this experience was a radical new approach for what this account actually says.

pages 177-178

Which might be an interesting place to start if you're looking for a different understanding of Genesis.

It also underlines the fact that sola scriptura notwithstanding, we all bring our worldviews to our reading of the Bible.
_________________________
So love is greater than knowledge; how could I have forgotten? Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm | Wishing Doesn't Make It So

Top
#167000 - 04/17/08 09:38 PM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: Shane]
melvin mccarty Offline


Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 504
Loc: B,C.
Problem is that chapter one and chapter two do not agree in a literal reading. We have to start explaining right away to make the first and second chapters agree.

mel

Top
#167073 - 04/18/08 01:20 AM Re: Creation Reconsidered: Scientific, Biblical, and Theo... [Re: melvin mccarty]
Shane Offline
Administrator of Foro Adventista

Registered: 02/02/02
Posts: 15483
Loc: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
The Bible only contradicts itself when one assumes each and every word was inspired by God. The message is inspired but the words which were chosen to express the message were chosen by erring and sinful men.

The only words written by God Himself were the Ten Commandments and MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN. We find God's creation account in the Fourth Commandment which clears up any misunderstanding some may have about the creation week recorded in Genesis.
_________________________
Check out the "Families" section here at Club Adventist.

Link > Shane's Page - updated 7/5/07

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2


Vegefood store

Be sure to click on the free shipping at the checkout else you get charged.


Who's Online
13 Registered (aldona, Bravus, carolaa, Fausto, Redwood, Taylor, 7 invisible), 40 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Shout Box

30 days FREE then only $3.50 per month for FULL membership. Cancel at any time.
Access even more forums by becoming a full member!

- - - - - - - - - - -
IF YOU LIVE IN NEW ZEALAND THIS IS YOUR LINK Still 30 days from
* * * NEW * * * NEW * * * NEW * * *
The Chat Room

Come Chat with others,
open 24/7

Newest Members
lriprogcr, bjslady, MailManX, tribeofjudah, Davelynne
2798 Registered Users
Adventist Ministries










l

Forum Members Books
















Forum Stats
2798 Members
138 Forums
16905 Topics
154321 Posts

Max Online: 1237 @ 04/20/07 08:43 PM
Top Posters
Amelia 17637
Shane 15482
Robert 14193
Gail 13147
Neil D 11812
Naomi 7176
Gerry Cabalo 7128
Gregory Matthews 7067
Redwood 6574
John317 6493
Bravus 6093
Nan 5800
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5016