Are they really necessary, couldn't you instead have created a new variety of bird or something?

This is hypnotic...I am still staring at it.

I have an idea...


...you will not believe in evolution.
...you will not believe in evolution.
...you will not believe in evolution.
...you will not believe in evolution.

God is not the author of deception (which the theory of evolution is).

oic, I guess that old serpent is up to his old tricks.

But evolution could also be one of those strong delusions.

Why should He not create evolutionists?

He created quite a number of slack-jawed pseudo-scientific anti-evolutionists as well.

Our God is great on using balance.

No I think the slack-jawed pseudo-scientific anti-evolutionists are here to contradictic the slack-jawed pseudo-scientific scientists who call being fat a disease but don't see a problem with homosexuality.

The funny part is when the scientists say well we used to think the homosexuals were crazy but then we saw that they could have commited relationships. I'm like well can't fat people have commited relationships, then being fat shouldn't be a disease either, lol.

Do you know what the English mean when they say 'don't be such a bore'? Curious minds want to know!

I assume that your lack of humanity has no negative emotion for negative actions like homosexuality. You are quite bored with my position.

what happens if your a fat homosexual?


over 30



wearing a bad rug



and speaky no inglesh?

Then you're no worse off than the rest of us. God can still heal you.


Wasn't Jesus who said don't trust anyone over thirty, (except me).

me as in Jesus, not me as in nishaun...

The weird part is when the scientists say well we used to think the homosexuals were crazy but then we saw that they could have commited relationships. I'm like well can't overweight people have commited relationships, then being overweight shouldn't be a disease either, lol.

You know what else I find weird? Why is it that the scientists in their fervent research have found no reason to promote the male/female parenting strategy. It is like in their research they found 100 reasons to be gay and 0 for what we know is correct. (A father and mother) that's a reason if any to laugh at these monkey worshipping scientists. Evolution created "100" reasons to be gay and 0 to be a male/female parent. Just another reason to trust the Bible's claim of a decayed humanity. I find it funny I was listening to the radio and the news guy actually refered to it as the "traditional family" I'm like, I thought it was the "human/scientific family."

100 reasons to be gay 1000 to fornicate but not one gene to promote male/female parenting.
Should Science be Taught in Schools?

Here is my personally reason for promoting a male/female parenting strategy.

One of the main reasons why a marriage consists of a male and a female is children. The human brain consists of two "main" parts the logical female left and the free spirited male right. If a child has no male parent they will be denied the freedom of humanity. If a child has no female parent they will be denied the logic and beauty of humanity. Both parents are needed it is a matter of physicality and emotion. The male philosophy strengthens and the female nurturers, without both a child is incomplete. Single parentage has been long disproved therefore any deviation from the natural is wrong, plain and simple.

It almost looks as if the world has a dark power ruling it...


well

I guess that is why Christians have to stay as far from the world as possible and "be ye separate."

This is one of the differences between Christianity and Islam, the Muslims believe they are going to physically and violently force the whole world to convert, while Christians only have to make God available. It is our job to be a voice crying in the wilderness to make a straight path for the Lord. It is not our job to convert, convince or condemn, our mission is to remind people of the truths that are or should be written in our hearts.

The path to Christ is a path of recognition!