Dear Christian,

Is there any corrilation between the 4 beasts (living creatures) of Ezekiel 1 & 3; the Cherubims of Ezekiel 10; and the 4 beasts of Revelation 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, & 19?
I have also noticed that the words "angel" and "Cherubim" are never interchanged in the Bible. Is there something to that?
On a related note; I don't see where "angels" are described as having wings or halos. Also, Satan is described as having had the position of a "covering cherubim" (like on the arc of the covenent), but never referred to as an "angel".
I have also descovered that the statues on the arc are called "Cherubims" and never referred to as "Angels"

Please enlighten me.

To find out about a title of Satan as an Angel .... dial 911. In Rev. 9:11 he is called an angel.

Cherubims are just a class of angels to my understanding.

In Ezekiel 10:5 "And the sound of the cherubims' wings was heard [even] to the outer court, as the voice of the Almighty God when he speaketh."

Ellen White describes them as Angels wings ...




Angels and Cherubims had different jobs. Angels were messagers and Cherubims are guards to my understanding. Of course .... I had to go to the authority .... MY WIFE. She tells me what is what.

I am sure you will get more learned people to respond soon.

Blessings ....

Thank you for your responce.
I think Rev. 9:11 is speaking symbolically, and I'm not sure that's even referring to Satan. Jesus is also referred to as an angel or the Arc Angel, although we know he is not one.

I know EGW describes angels with wings, but I was referring to the Bible alone. Where do non SDA's get the idea of angels having wings?

Yes, Angels and Cherubims have different jobs for sure. The question is; are the same species?

I think probably there are more things in heaven... than are dreamt of in our philosophy. There's no particular reason for angels to be the winged humanoids we often see them painted as, and many reasons for them not to be. When Ezekial talks about beasts with four faces pointing in different directions and eight wings, I think that's giving us some sense of their strangeness... but even that is only his attempt to render them in comprehensible human images he and his audience was familiar with.

And, a separate point, the Scholastics had described a whole complex hierarchy of different classes and types of angels - might be worth checking that out.

And on *another* point, I think 'cherubims' is incorrect. 'Cherub' is the singular and 'cherubim' is the plural, so there's no need for the 's' to make it plural.

Thanks Bravus. I didn't know that. I will correct my double plural.

Probably because the Bible describes angels as flying. Also, the handcrafted angels on the ark of the covenant had wings.

I found this on another site



See also...

Halo (religious iconography)

Part of my question deals with the fact that the figures on the arc are always called "Cherubims" and never as "Angels".

Also, the only "Angels" that I have found descibed as flying are the symbolic angels such as the "3 angels"... "flying in the mist of heaven".

You're right. Doesn't Revelation describe angels in heaven as having six wings, and also covering their faces with their wings? I can't remember offhand. I guess I've never thought much about that. Angel simply means messenger, so it's hard to say.