Club Adventist
Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do.
And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with
– even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department.
Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently. Romans 14.1: The Message
Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#190585 - 10/04/08 06:39 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: BobRyan]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
Quote:

James White's Article "The Nation"[/b]

By August, 1862, it seemed to James White that something must be said. He placed an editorial in the Review and Herald of August 12 titled "The Nation." In this article he expressed his own opinion of the responsibility for the acts of the drafted soldiers. This was to cause considerable controversy. He wrote:

Quote:

For the past ten years the Review has taught that the United
States of America were a subject of prophecy, and that slavery is
pointed out in the prophetic word as the darkest and most
damning sin upon this nation.
It has taught that Heaven has
wrath in store for the nation which it would drink to the very
dregs, as due punishment for the sin of slavery. And the
anti-slavery teachings of several of our publications
based upon
certain prophecies have been such that their circulation has been
positively forbidden
in the slave States. Those of our people who
voted at all in the last Presidential election, to a man voted for
Abraham Lincoln.





Upholding the Law of God and the value of human life was a strong theme for Ellen and James White

Quote:


[b]Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, October 1, 1895, paragraph 7

Article Title: Rule in the Fear of God

Every man, woman, and child is God's property, and has been bought with a price, even with the infinite price of the precious blood of the Son of God. God will not tolerate injustice from man to his fellow-men. He will not pass over oppression and wrong. Men in office cannot permit the practice of injustice and yet be clear from the judgment of God. For the sake of their own souls, and for the sake of the souls of others, men in positions of trust should seek to do good to their fellow-men, representing the character of the great Lawgiver. "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them; for this is the law and the prophets." It is not God's design that men should be cold, hard-hearted, and oppressive toward their fellow men, and they will not be excused in being oppressive simply because they are invested with authority. Every work is to be brought into judgment, and every secret thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil, and every man will be rewarded according as his work has been. Those who practice injustice and oppression set at naught the authority of God, and declare by their actions that they have no regard for the word of Christ, who has purchased redemption at an infinite cost. Men should remember that no matter what customs have prevailed, no matter what laws have been brought into existence, the great Lawgiver is to be obeyed. God's law is to hold the supreme place, and is not made void by the maxims, customs, and inventions of men. Those who devise laws contrary to the law of God, will be brought into judgment, and will receive according to their dues.



We have not drifted far at all from the problem of doubting the value of human life that they had back in the 1800's.

in Christ,

Bob


Edited by BobRyan (10/04/08 06:40 AM)

Top
#190586 - 10/04/08 06:40 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: BobRyan]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 9100
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
Quote:
Republicanism and Protestantism became the fundamental principles of the nation. These principles are the secret of its power and prosperity.


I think the Republican Party while not intended here ... could also be used in the same breath. I think the Republican Party does hold the key to prosperity for it is based on good Biblical principles. But that is for another forum. We should not breath a word of politics on this forum.
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Love WON Another.
Redwood the tree

Top
#190587 - 10/04/08 06:43 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: John317]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
Originally Posted By: John317

I have to confess that I have mixed thoughts and feelings about gay marriage. I actually believe on the basis of Scripture that the SDa church itself should not perform or recognize any gay marriages. However, I do believe that the state should allow them.


My point is that if the right to privacy and the separation of church and stated were not sufficient to dictate policy when it came to prohibition - then even less so when dealing with the much larger moral issue of the topic you listed.

in Christ,

Bob

Top
#190588 - 10/04/08 06:46 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: Redwood]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
Originally Posted By: Redwood
Quote:
Republicanism and Protestantism became the fundamental principles of the nation. These principles are the secret of its power and prosperity.


I think the Republican Party while not intended here ... could also be used in the same breath. I think the Republican Party does hold the key to prosperity for it is based on good Biblical principles. But that is for another forum. We should not breath a word of politics on this forum.


Hence my added statement in that post that "Republicanism" in that context that Ellen White used it was not a reference to any political party -- it was a reference to the National form of government -- we are in fact "a Republic" not a pure democracy.

The reason I listed the quote however is not for the "Republicanism" statement it is because of the "Protestantism" statement.

in Christ,

Bob

Top
#190589 - 10/04/08 06:48 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: Redwood]
John317 Moderator Online   content


Registered: 11/13/05
Posts: 10453
Loc: CA
Originally Posted By: Redwood
Quote:
I mean her position as the "messenger of the Lord" rather than her personal beliefs or feelings.


Before this question is answered ... could you please share with us how you can know which is which? Do we assume that her words are just her words unless she says "I was shown"?

I've tried to nail you on this question many times before and have yet to have received an answer.


In the subject we're talking about-- abortion and gay marriages-- Ellen White would naturally have her own personal feelings or beliefs. But those personal feelings are not necessarily related to what she would have been told to write.

For instance, there was one time when someone asked her if they should construct a building. She gave her opinion in the positive, not as the messenger of the Lord, but simply as an individual, much as she might tell someone that a certain tree should be planted in a certain location. Later, she received a vision in which God showed her that the building should not b constructed after all.

That is what I mean by Ellen White's having private ideas and thoughts as an individual.


Top
#190590 - 10/04/08 06:50 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: Redwood]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
Originally Posted By: Redwood
Quote:
I mean her position as the "messenger of the Lord" rather than her personal beliefs or feelings.


Before this question is answered ... could you please share with us how you can know which is which? Do we assume that her words are just her words unless she says "I was shown"?

I've tried to nail you on this question many times before and have yet to have received an answer.


I think the first quote box at this post link is helpful in that regard -

http://adventistforum.com/forum/ubbthrea...of_h#Post190568


The vision - or dream mentioned there is this one - I think

Quote:

The issue under discussion was on the matter of voting for prohibition.
Twenty-six years later, G. B. Starr, laboring in Australia, was confronted with a similar question. He called to mind how Ellen White, at the Iowa meeting, related a dream in which she seemed to be in a large gathering where the temperance movement was being discussed.

Quote:

A fine-looking man with pen in hand was circulating a temperance pledge, but none would sign. As the visitor was leaving, he turned and said: {3BIO 159.4}

Quote:

God designs to help the people in a great movement on this
subject. He also designed that you, as a people, should be the

160

head and not the tail in the movement; but now the position you
have taken will place you at the tail.--In DF 274, "The Des
Moines, Iowa, Temperance Experience." {3BIO 159.5}




in Christ,

Bob


Edited by BobRyan (10/04/08 06:53 AM)

Top
#190591 - 10/04/08 06:52 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: John317]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 9100
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
So what gave you and those at her time ... the clue that the first statement was her own opinion? Did she state it clearly that it was such?
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Love WON Another.
Redwood the tree

Top
#190592 - 10/04/08 06:59 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: Redwood]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
The point is that history shows that both James and Ellen White were strong political activists (directing the early SDA church into activism on very specific topics -- not all political topics are moral issues ) when it came to clear moral issues regarding Alchohol and the slavery.

Slavery was the issue of property - vs the value of human life.

Alchohol was the issue of right to privacy - vs the moral issue of a kind of health abuse.


Today we have the same issues only the moral offense is even greater in the case of institutionalized killing of infants and government sanctioned immorality (both of which are listed in Lev 18 as being among the abominations for which the non-Hebrew - non-Bible nations were expelled from their lands prior to Israel).

The point is to call for prayer and awarness of Christians so that we might be like Daniel confessing before God our own sins and the sins of our nation. (Dan 9:1-4)

in Christ,

Bob




Edited by BobRyan (10/04/08 07:03 AM)

Top
#190593 - 10/04/08 07:01 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: Redwood]
BobRyan Offline


Registered: 09/26/08
Posts: 642
Originally Posted By: Redwood
So what gave you and those at her time ... the clue that the first statement was her own opinion? Did she state it clearly that it was such?


She states it as an example of the Holy Spirit taking action in that quote block section highlighted in red. I did not get from it that she was saying "this is just a hobby horse of mine". (so to speak).

in Christ,

Bob


Edited by BobRyan (10/04/08 07:02 AM)

Top
#190594 - 10/04/08 07:04 AM Re: SDA Moral issues - value of human life - right to privacy [Re: BobRyan]
Redwood Online   content
Swiss n Swedish American

Registered: 12/09/06
Posts: 9100
Loc: A citizen of Heaven
Quote:
The point is to call for prayer and awarness of Christians so that we might be like Daniel confessing before God our own sins and the sins of our nation. (Dan 9:1-4)



Praise God He is a just God ...

Quote:
2 Cor 5:19 "To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation."
_________________________
Another one of Woodies Goodies
Love WON Another.
Redwood the tree

Top
Page 2 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >


Moderator:  John317, John317, John317, John317 
Our Store


SEARCH OUR SITE

Custom Search
30 days FREE

This full membership income helps pay for hosting, advertising, domain names, software support etc etc
Shout Box

The Chat Room

Come Chat with others,
open 24/7

Who's Online
49 registered (Beryl, Bob Carmin, Bravus, BrokenAdventist, bygjymbo, CoAspen, darlene, David-Kingsley, dgrimm60, Doug, eddie, Ellen, fccool, forgie, Gladussee, Heather Cummings, Jerry D Thomas, John317, Kountzer, LifeHiscost, Lineman, Liz, mannybr2003, melvin mccarty, Nan, Neil D, Nightingale, olger, pkrause, rab, Raphael, Redwood, Robert, SMAN, Sulla, Suzanne Sutton, Taylor, Vera, 11 invisible), 466 Guests and 116 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Featured Member
Registered: 10/02/08
Posts: 59
Top Posters (30 Days)
John317 511
Redwood 476
Shane 308
Neil D 260
Bravus 253
Robert 231
Stan Jensen 159
Gail 142
Amelia 135
pkrause 116
Taylor 115
Liz 113
olger 104
fccool 100
Nan 88
carolaa 80
Lineman 72
Gerry Cabalo 60
CoAspen 55
BobRyan 55
Top Posters
Amelia 18479
Shane 17020
Robert 15446
Gail 13646
Neil D 13254
John317 10453
Redwood 9100
Gerry Cabalo 7436
Naomi 7196
Bravus 7139
Gregory Matthews 7113
Nan 6047
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5051
cricket 4903
bevin 4699
LifeHiscost 4169
Stan Jensen 3945
D. Allan 3883
dgrimm60 3615
Newest Members
rab, historyb, TeensMom, Grace3, Dr. Lorraine Day
2976 Registered Users

THE ADVENTIST FORUM® is a self-supporting ministry and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland or any of its subsidiaries.
Copyright © ClubAdventist.com® 1999 - 2008