Club Adventist
Welcome with open arms fellow believers who don’t see things the way you do.
And don’t jump all over them every time they do or say something you don’t agree with
– even when it seems that they are strong on opinions but weak in the faith department.
Remember, they have their own history to deal with. Treat them gently. Romans 14.1: The Message
Page 6 of 10 < 1 2 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#40521 - 05/25/05 05:56 AM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! ****** [Re: ]
Shane Offline
Administrator of Foro Adventista

Registered: 02/02/02
Posts: 17001
Loc: Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Quote:

you'll be wanting us to wear special underwear like the mormons.




The mormons have special underwear? Are they made by the Amish?
_________________________
I reserve the humble right to be wrong.

Link > Shane's Page - update in progress

Top
Visiting any ads that interest you helps to pay for our ads
#40522 - 05/25/05 06:02 AM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
cricket Offline


Registered: 11/11/03
Posts: 4900
In response to Dennis' post to mine, thought I'd mention that I am tired of the excuse that men have, "I'll only quit looking when I'm dead."

If you really must know, these men who keep looking are dead already.

___________________

So, today I was at my son's ice skating lesson. His lessons are held at a rink at the local mall. Across the hallway is a newly-opened bowling alley.

They have a dress code that sounds reasonable. Among the several items listed is, "No exposure of intimate apparel." What I happened to find quite stunning was the dress of the ladies handing out informational flyers in the open foyer. They were dressed in stilletto heels, fish-net stockings, black mini-skirts, black "wife-beater" tees, exposed bra straps and a necklace or fuzzy black tie.

What part of the dress code did they not understand?

I questioned them about this seemingly double-standard. Turns out, these young ladies felt that their dress was appropriate and did not violate the "code". They also gave me the added footnote: "That's really just for the guys. Girls can wear whatever they want."

They also told me that they thought their outfits were "cute" and not of a revealing nature at all.

Sadly, my nine year old son will have to find another entrance to his lessons because I will no longer allow him to take the normal entrance through the mall.

Our society has become ridiculously absurd.
_________________________
http://tinyurl.com/6ncnzl

Top
#40523 - 05/25/05 06:04 AM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: mausman]
wicklunds Offline


Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 993
Loc: In the heart of SDA culturevil...
okay weve taken up the better part of two pages on this one and peopl dont seem to care that much...dunno what more to say except I am somewhat disheveled by all the rationalizations and nonsensical attitudes. I cannot help but wonder if there is anyone out there with some like-minded convictions. Kinda sad.
_________________________
It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}

Top
#40524 - 05/25/05 06:26 AM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
Bravus Online   content
Husband and Father

Registered: 09/05/04
Posts: 7118
Loc: Brisbane, Australia
OK, let me be very serious with it for a moment.

There are a couple of issues here, and part of the problem is that they've all been addressed in a mashed-together sort of way. Let me try to sort them out:

1. I think we all agree with you, Dennis, that modest dress is appropriate in church and everywhere else. If people at your church are dressing immodestly, I think we would agree that that's inappropriate. (I'm leaving aside the fact that modesty is in the eye of the beholder to some extent: I don't think we're agreed on the need for burqas or 'reform dress' (long trousers under long skirts))

2. But once you've decided that's an issue, what do you do with it? I think the consensus here is that you leave it to God - and to some extent to example - to deal with the issue, and you attend to what you can change. You are accountable to God for your own actions, and to some extent for the actions of your children. Others are accountable for their own actions.

3. Even assuming that you are to some extent responsible for sharing concerns with others in the church, how should that be done? Presumably not by shouting from the housetop and pointing a shaking finger of condemnation. Someone who is trusted, respected and close to the person who is dressing inappropriately may be able to make a suggestion or comment, but someone with no relationship is not in a position to make a comment that will be heard.

4. Finally, you are responsible for your own reactions to how others dress. This may not even be a specific issue for you - it's something others have brought up in the thread. Let me just speak for myself - I find women attractive and sexy, and sometimes at church as well as everywhere else I notice the shape of their bodies, and my body reacts to that (to be explicit for a moment, I'm not talking about erections, I'm talking about noticing and pulse-quickening and other low level but noticeable reactions (slightly more explicit, highlight only if you want to read)). That can happen with 'immodest' clothing, but it can also happen with very modest clothing. It's part of how we are built as men, and not something for which women are to be blamed or shamed. It's our choice how we react to that, and really has little to do with how the women dress.

Probably more information than anyone wanted or needed, but I did want to take your question seriously and address it, Dennis.


Edited by Bravus (05/25/05 06:34 AM)
_________________________
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate

Top
#40525 - 05/25/05 12:18 PM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
LifeHiscost Online   content


Registered: 06/14/03
Posts: 4164
Loc: Western United States
Quote:


Let's get some thinking going here ...




Wading into this at this point is like hitting the hornet's nest the second time because there weren't enough people stung the first time around. Judging ( there's that word again) from the furor that has occurred it would appear the Holy Spirit has spoken to many, though I'm uncertain what is understood by each who have heard His voice. I haven't seen this much heat generated since I last heard someone speak on how deep we ought to be digging in our wallets to support whatever cause.

It does seem as if, when we are in no need of defense for our proper behavior, we don't find near the motivation to express a great deal of personal defending. After all, no one has disputed my right to wear cotton socks to church, or wherever else I may choose to wear them. So I'll not defend myself on that score. However I do recall some loving words of Jesus to His beloved.

"As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent." Rev 3:19 NKJV

Does it make any difference which instrument our Father uses
to express Himself to His erring children? If the shoe doesn't fit, our Father won't insist that we wear it.


Blessings!
_________________________
Lift Jesus up!!

Top
#40526 - 05/25/05 12:46 PM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
wicklunds Offline


Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 993
Loc: In the heart of SDA culturevil...
Yes people, there are more important things to address in the scope of our religious lives, but this is one issue that is dealt with on a personal level. But there must be some way for us to hold each other accountable without each of us being offended for addressing it.

Looking at the Old Testament, it is interesting to note the story of the sons of God vs. the sons of men.

Gen 6:1 Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them,
Gen 6:2 that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose.
Gen 6:3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years."
Gen 6:4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
Gen 6:5 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Gen 6:6 The LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.

Here one could certainly notice a distinction made in these verses (and others)between the sons of God and the sons and daughters of men. My question then is, How ought the sons (and daughters) of God be dressing in light of a distinction between those who are men's children, and those who are God's children? God has His children that He needs to be peculiar and set apart from the rest of the world right?

Rev 18:4 I heard another voice from heaven, saying, "Come out of her, my people, so that you will not participate in her sins and receive of her plagues;
Rev 18:5 for her sins have piled up as high as heaven, and God has remembered her iniquities.

Are we doing anything at all to deliberately show that we are not like Babylon in our dress (and other areas)? What can we offer people that is any different at all from the world around us? We have already mentioned the Amish and others, they are known for old-fashioned dress. What about Adventists?


Edited by wicklunds (05/25/05 12:49 PM)
_________________________
It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}

Top
#40527 - 05/25/05 02:49 PM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
wicklunds Offline


Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 993
Loc: In the heart of SDA culturevil...
Well,

I must publicly apologize to people here on this because, in all honesty, I thought this text was referring to Christian dress. The reason I thought this, was because I got it from a different forum: http://www.revivalsermons.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=614

In a particular post there, by Tammy Roesch, she talks about the passage in context with dress. Again, I am truly sorry if this has damaged anyone. I never wanted anyone to look like the Amish, just to consider how we are dressed for the Lord. Thanks for understanding. Dennis
_________________________
It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}

Top
#40528 - 05/25/05 03:40 PM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
Nicodema Offline


Registered: 11/22/03
Posts: 777
Loc: Beyond your grasp
Quote:

it would appear the Holy Spirit has spoken to many, though I'm uncertain what is understood by each who have heard His voice. I haven't seen this much heat generated since I last heard someone speak on how deep we ought to be digging in our wallets to support whatever cause.

It does seem as if, when we are in no need of defense for our proper behavior, we don't find near the motivation to express a great deal of personal defending.




Which is precisely why I did not enter a lengthy discourse defending my typical church attire, which (if anyone really cares) has me adequately covered from the bottom of the neck (or higher in winter) down to my mid-calf or ankle -- or completely to my feet if I'm wearing boots -- in loose-fitting garments of budget-level pricing. I simply did not feel a need to defend myself on this count.

FWIW I don't think this thread is really THAT heated, LHC! It's only moderately warm compared to some I've seen here on C/A.
_________________________
"After such knowledge, what forgiveness?" -- T.S. Eliot

Top
#40529 - 05/26/05 10:53 AM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: ]
LifeHiscost Online   content


Registered: 06/14/03
Posts: 4164
Loc: Western United States
Quote:

I simply did not feel a need to defend myself on this count.




I understand. Over the years I've learned it removes much stress from my life, when considering whether I might be guilty of something of greater or lesser sins, to allow Jesus to defend me. First, if I'm guilty He doesn't condemn. If I'm not, He defends me with far better results according to His timetable.

"Yet these false teachers, who claim authority from their dreams, live immoral lives, defy authority, and scoff at the power of the glorious ones. But even Michael, one of the mightiest of the angels, did not dare accuse Satan of blasphemy, but simply said, "The Lord rebuke you." (This took place when Michael was arguing with Satan about Moses' body.) But these people mock and curse the things they do not understand. Like animals, they do whatever their instincts tell them, and they bring about their own destruction." Jude 1:8-10 NLT

I'm not indicating anybody in this thread fits this mold. Merely revealing the principle even heavenly beings follow when in dispute with the enemies of God.

Quote:

FWIW I don't think this thread is really THAT heated, LHC! It's only moderately warm compared to some I've seen here on C/A.




Point well taken. It seemed to me like a flash fire, many smaller fires flaming in a very short period of time. However no one with deep or lasting rancor. And I did appreciate wicklunds later response.

Keep looking up!
_________________________
Lift Jesus up!!

Top
#40530 - 05/26/05 01:40 PM Re: Fashion police, look here!!! [Re: res0pgdo]
wicklunds Offline


Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 993
Loc: In the heart of SDA culturevil...
Quote:


To my mind, you have rejected the concept that Holy Spirit works in other people's lives to influence them. You are beyond hope in this area...The evidence is your posts themselves. The posts themselves show you attempting to do the Lord's work by being the Lord Himself and ordering people to do what you see needs to be done.

This type of attitude is counter productive to the Lord's work and to the church as a whole. Until you come to the attitude that people are attempting to do the best they can, inspite of all thier failings, you can never be the influence you so desire.





Yes yes yes! Niel, I finally see what it was that you were trying to convey in your posts before. You were saying that:

1.) I do not exhibit the influence I desire because I don't agree with the way you choose to influence others.

2.) The way you influence people is better than mine because it is not Cynical...hmmmm(?).

3.) Thou Shalt not be cynical.

4.) Being cynical is blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

5.) By my initial post, I am commanding that people conform to my standards of holy attire.


Sorry Niel... I just don't get it. All I was trying to do initially was bring people's attention to the fact that we arent much different than the world in the way we dress. And yet, this makes me the worst kind of blasphemer, and this constitutes a denial of the Holy Spirit leading in other's lives. Care to rearrange the thoughts of your post so that I could understand better why my post warrants such condemnation? It is the least you could do for a brother.
_________________________
It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy. {ST, February 19, 1894 par. 4}

Top
Page 6 of 10 < 1 2 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >


Moderator:  John317, John317 
Our Store


SEARCH OUR SITE

Custom Search
30 days FREE

This full membership income helps pay for hosting, advertising, domain names, software support etc etc
Shout Box

The Chat Room

Come Chat with others,
open 24/7

Who's Online
53 registered (aldona, Beryl, Bravus, bygjymbo, CoAspen, Contented, darlene, dgrimm60, Doug, Dr. Lorraine Day, fccool, Gladussee, Grace3, Gregory Matthews, Heather Cummings, Jerry D Thomas, John317, Kevin H, Kountzer, LifeHiscost, Liz, LynnDel, magilly46, melvin mccarty, Morning Glory, Nan, Neil D, olger, pkrause, Redwood, Robert, Taylor, TeensMom, truthseeker007, Vera, 18 invisible), 472 Guests and 207 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Featured Member
Registered: 10/29/02
Posts: 185
Top Posters (30 Days)
John317 569
Redwood 504
Shane 368
Neil D 323
Bravus 262
Robert 237
Stan Jensen 159
Amelia 140
Gail 135
fccool 128
pkrause 119
olger 119
Liz 114
carolaa 114
Taylor 96
Nan 90
BobRyan 84
Lineman 74
Gerry Cabalo 66
CoAspen 57
Top Posters
Amelia 18470
Shane 17001
Robert 15441
Gail 13626
Neil D 13243
John317 10414
Redwood 9040
Gerry Cabalo 7436
Naomi 7196
Bravus 7118
Gregory Matthews 7113
Nan 6044
Shirley 5292
ChildofChrist 5051
cricket 4900
bevin 4699
LifeHiscost 4164
Stan Jensen 3940
D. Allan 3883
dgrimm60 3597
Newest Members
TeensMom, Grace3, Dr. Lorraine Day, LADELERALEY, zestos
2974 Registered Users

THE ADVENTIST FORUM® is a self-supporting ministry and is not part of, or affiliated with, or endorsed by
The General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland or any of its subsidiaries.
Copyright © ClubAdventist.com® 1999 - 2008